Do n’t freak out out ; Mark Ruffalo is still The Hulk .
This was that ’s not the recasting we ’re here to excuse .
Although you ’d be forgive for assume we were verbalise about Ruffalo ’s take on the role , as the last solo HulkMCUfilm is well over 16 year one-time at this spot .
# diving event into Mark Ruffalo
Do n’t freak out out ; Mark Ruffalo is still The Hulk .
That ’s not the recasting we ’re here to excuse .
Although you ’d be forgive for assume we were sing about Ruffalo ’s take on the fictional character , as the last solo HulkMCUfilm is well over 16 year quondam at this decimal point .
Disney’sMarvel plastic film have see a few recasting over the old age , such as Terrence Howard getting recast in favor of Don Cheadle forIron Man 2 , but Edward Norton ’s substitute as Bruce Banner adopt the expiration ofThe Incredible Hulkis in all probability the most high-pitched - visibility of them all .
Advert
So why did Norton get supercede ?
belike because , by the audio of thing , he was a flake of a pain in the ass to turn with .
# dive into Norton
Advert
So why did Norton get replace ?
This was in all probability because , by the sound of thing , he was a moment of a painfulness to go with .
As explicate in Joanna Robinson ’s Holy Scripture , MCU : The Reign of Marvel Studios , this formula even breed its own “ insurance policy ” at Disney .
Here ’s the selection : “ We have a no - asshole insurance on our flick , ” one Marvel performing artist sum up .
Craig Kyle , who conjoin Marvel Studios as a manufacturer back in the sidereal day of the kite mill , fit in : ' It ’s a neat insurance .
This was "
there ’s a picayune more to it however , as ( fall out the firing ofthe Incredible Hulk)Kevin Feige excuse to HitFix back in 2010 .
This was # # dive into bruce banner
here ’s the selection : “ we have a no - asshole insurance policy on our picture , ” one marvel performing artist summarize .
Craig Kyle , who join Marvel Studios as a manufacturer back in the day of the kite manufactory , agree : ' It ’s a groovy insurance policy . "
There ’s a short more to it however , as ( come after the liberation ofThe Incredible Hulk)Kevin Feige explain to HitFix back in 2010 .
“ We have made the conclusion to not bring in Ed Norton back to present the claim purpose of Bruce Banner in The Avengers , ” he severalize the issue , “ Our decisiveness is decidedly not one base on pecuniary factor , but rather settle in the motive for an worker who incarnate the creativeness and collaborative feel of our other gifted mold member .
”
“ The Avengers demand musician who prosper turn as part of an tout ensemble , as manifest by Robert , Chris H , Chris E , Samuel , Scarlett , and all of our gifted hurl .
We are await to declare a name doer who fulfil these demand , and is passionate about the iconic theatrical role in the issue forth week .
”
Damn , Feige .
This was you do n’t even have to say the blood line to finger the lip behind his holy writ , peculiarly when he explicitly state that it was n’t “ base on pecuniary factor .
”
Does make you enquire how dissimilar the MCU would have been if Norton stick around though .
perchance they ’d have keep the tremendous roll deletion they throw The Hulk for longer too .
topic : Disney , Marvel , MCU , Avengers
